Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MADHAV YASHWNT PAWARversusPANKAJ JANARDHAN SALUNKE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the writ petition is infructuous as it has been rendered stale by the passage of time.

Summary

Madhav Yashwant Pawar filed a writ petition (WP 5514 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Pankaj Janardan Salunke and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court considered whether the passage of time rendered the petition stale and incapable of further relief. Relying on the submission of counsel, the bench found no merit in proceeding with the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to the passage of time?

Subjects

  • limitation
  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:31121



                                                                  11 WP5514.2015
                                              -1-

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             11 WRIT PETITION NO. 5514 OF 2015

                                MADHAV YASHWNT PAWAR
                                            VERSUS
                       PANKAJ JANARDHAN SALUNKE AND OTHERS
                                               ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Akash M. Jaju h/f. Mr. Manish P.
              Tripathi
              AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B. V. Virdhe
                                               ...


                                         CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                             Date : 27.07.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.         Mr. Akash M. Jaju holding for Mr. Manish P. Tripathi,

              learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that by passage of time

              the Petition is rendered infructuous.


              2.         The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.




                                                      (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.