Bombay High Court
MADHAV YASHWNT PAWARversusPANKAJ JANARDHAN SALUNKE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The Court held that the writ petition is infructuous as it has been rendered stale by the passage of time.
Summary
Madhav Yashwant Pawar filed a writ petition (WP 5514 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Pankaj Janardan Salunke and others. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court considered whether the passage of time rendered the petition stale and incapable of further relief. Relying on the submission of counsel, the bench found no merit in proceeding with the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to the passage of time?
Subjects
- limitation
- writ petition
- infructuous
- procedural law
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:31121
11 WP5514.2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
11 WRIT PETITION NO. 5514 OF 2015
MADHAV YASHWNT PAWAR
VERSUS
PANKAJ JANARDHAN SALUNKE AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Akash M. Jaju h/f. Mr. Manish P.
Tripathi
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B. V. Virdhe
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 27.07.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Mr. Akash M. Jaju holding for Mr. Manish P. Tripathi,
learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that by passage of time
the Petition is rendered infructuous.
2. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…