Bombay High Court
RAJESHWAR SHAMRAO DHOBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The order of the Secretary of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee dated 15/5/2016 is without jurisdiction and is set aside.
Summary
The petitioner challenged two orders – one dated 16/11/2015 by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Hingoli and another dated 15/5/2016 by the Secretary of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Jawala Bazar – alleging lack of jurisdiction. The Court examined the delegation of powers under Section 41‑A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (Regulation) Act, 1965, noting that such powers are vested in the Director of Marketing and delegated to Divisional Joint Registrars, not to the APMC Secretary. Consequently, the Court held that the APMC order was beyond its jurisdiction and quashed it. The matter was remanded to the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co‑operative Societies, Aurangabad to decide the proceedings with a hearing within four months. The Court expressly refrained from deciding the merits and left all issues open.
Issues considered
- Whether the order passed by the Secretary of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee is within its jurisdiction
- Whether powers under Section 41‑A of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (Regulation) Act, 1965 are correctly delegated to the APMC Secretary
Legislation cited
- Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (Regulation) Act, 1965 — s. 41-A
Subjects
- jurisdiction
- delegation of powers
- Agricultural Produce Market Committee
- Co-operative Societies
- Writ Petition
- quashing order
- Maharashtra law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:20914
Writ Petition No.5561/2016
:: 1 ::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5561 OF 2016
Rajeshwar s/o Shamrao Dhoble ….Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ….Respondents
.......
Mr. S.K. Chavan, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. R.B. Dhaware, A.G.P. for State
Mr. G.J. Pahilwan, Advocate for R.No.5
Mr. Ajinkya Kale, Advocate for
Talekar & Associates for R.No.6
....…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 30th APRIL, 2026
O R D E R:
1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties for
some time.
2. By the present petition, the petitioner assails the order
dated 16/11/2015, passed by District Deputy Registrar, Co-
operative Societies, Hingoli and the order dated 15/5/2016, passed
by the Secretary, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Jawala
Bazar, Taluka Aundha, District Hingoli
Writ Petition No.5561/2016
:: 2 ::
3. Mr. Chavan, learned counsel for the petitioner invited
my attention to the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the
respondents No.2 and 3 more particularly paragraph No.5, by
pointing out that, the powers under Section 41-A of the
Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee
(Regulation) Act, 1965 are delegated by the Director of Marketing
to all the Divisional Joint Registrars, Co-operative Societies.
4. Admittedly, after going through the reply, I find that, in
the present petition, the order dated 16/11/2015, passed by the
District Deputy Registrar, Hingoli is assailed. Therefore, I find that,
the order passed by the A.P.M.C. is without jurisdiction and the
same is quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the
Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad. The
Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad is
directed to decide the proceedings by giving opportunity of hearing
to all the concerned within a period of four months from the date of
this order. With these directions, Writ Petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that, this Court has not recorded any
finding on the merits of the matter and the authority shall consider
Writ Petition No.5561/2016
:: 3 ::
all the issues which are raised in the present petition. All the issues
are kept open.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…