Bombay High Court
AMBUBAI SURESH PAVTEKARversusSUMAN MADHUKARRAO CHINKE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
A writ petition stands abated if the petitioner dies and no legal representative is brought on record.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. During the proceedings, the petitioner died and no legal representatives were filed on record. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition should be abated. The court examined whether a writ petition can continue in the absence of a surviving petitioner or any representative. It held that without a legal representative, the petition cannot proceed and therefore stands abated. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can continue after the death of the petitioner when no legal representative is brought on record?
Subjects
- writ petition
- abatement
- death of petitioner
- legal representation
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24638
86-WP-5611-19.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
86 WRIT PETITION NO. 5611 OF 2019
Ambubai Suresh Pavtekar
VERSUS
Suman Madhukarrao Chinke And Others
......
Mr. H.V. Tungar, Advocate for Petitioner
Mr. A.I. Patel, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4 & 5-B
......
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 22 JUNE, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has
expired and no legal representatives have been brought on record. In view
thereof, the writ petition stands abated.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
S P Rane
Checking your session…