Bombay High Court
BAGARIA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPESversusSHRI. MANOHAR RAMCHANDRA THACKREY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suits have been disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Bagaria Builders and Developers, failed to appear before the High Court. The petitioner’s counsel did not serve the unserved respondents, and the respondent’s counsel submitted copies of orders dismissing Special Civil Suit No. 203 of 2008 and Regular Civil Suit No. 6 of 2010. These orders formed the basis of the writ petition. Since the underlying suits had already been disposed of, the court found the writ petition to be without any operative relief. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a writ petition when the substantive civil suits on which it is based have been dismissed?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit dismissal
- high court order
- non-appearance
Judgment
6-wp-5615-2013.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5615 OF 2013
Bagaria Builders and Developers … Petitioner
vs.
Shri Manohar Ramchandra Thackrey and Ors … Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. Pradeep D. Dalvi for Respondent No.11.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 2nd APRIL 2026
ORDER:
1. None appears for the petitioner. As per the office remark,
learned advocate for the petitioner has not taken any steps to serve
the unserved respondents. Learned counsel for respondent no.11
has tendered copies of orders dated 6th October 2023 and 5th July
2024 recording dismissal of Special Civil Suit No. 203 of 2008 and
Regular Civil Suit No. 6 of 2010. The copies of the orders are taken
on record. The orders impugned in this petition are arising out of the
said suits.
2. In view of disposal of the suits, the writ petition is dismissed
as infructuous.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 1 of 1
Checking your session…