Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHAN BHIMRAO MANE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 24 January 2020 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The dismissal was entered by the two judges of the Bombay High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners do not appear or take steps to pursue it

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 DTG                                                                  100-Wp-564-2020.doc



                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 564 OF 2020

                 Mohan Bhimrao Mane & Anr.                                          … Petitioners
                                V/s.
                 The State of Maharashtra                                           … Respondent
                                           _______________________________________

                 None for Petitioners.

                 Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                  _______________________________________

                                                    CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                    DATE  : 31st July 2026

                 P.C. :

                 1)                    None for the Petitioners when called out for hearing.

                 2)                    Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                 24th January 2020, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocates have taken any

                 steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                 2.1)                  It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the

                 Petition.

                 3)                    Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                       ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

              Digitally signed by
              DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR   TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM     GHUMNAR                                                                                       1/1
GHUMNAR       Date: 2026.08.06
              19:09:17 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.