Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASHOK S/O DAYALDAS MANDHAN,AND OTHERS.versusSADASHIV S/O GANPAT DHEKALE,AND OTHERS.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution because the petitioner failed to pursue the matter and lost interest.

Summary

The petitioner, Ashok, filed Writ Petition No. 5732 of 2005 in the High Court of Bombay. No steps were taken to prosecute the petition thereafter, and the petitioner expressed loss of interest in the matter. The Court observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred without any action by the petitioner. Applying the principle that a court may dismiss a petition for want of prosecution when the petitioner shows indifference, the judges ordered dismissal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's inaction and loss of interest

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                     202 WP 5732-05.DOC



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       WRIT PETITION NO. 5732 OF 2005


Ashok s/o Dayaldas Mandhan                                    ...Petitioner
      Versus
Sadashiv s/o Ganpat Dhekale & Ors.                            ...Respondents
                                     _______
None for Petitioner.
                                     _______

                                  CORAM:        G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                AARTI SATHE, JJ.

                                  DATE:         25 JUNE 2026

P.C.

           None for the Petitioner. It appears that due to passage of time, the

Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, dismissed for want of

prosecution.




        (AARTI SATHE, J.)                       (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)




                                  Page 1 of 1
Laxmi


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.