Bombay High Court
MOIRAE GENERICS PVT. LTD. THR ITS DIRECTORversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER FOOD AND DRUG AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHARMILA U DESHMUKH
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to provide instructions to counsel.
Summary
The petitioner, Moirae Generics Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the Assistant Commissioner, Food and Drug. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he had not received any instructions from the petitioner to continue with the proceedings. Consequently, the counsel was unable to advance the case. The Court considered the lack of instructions as a failure to prosecute the petition. In view of this, the Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh on 13 January 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner’s counsel receives no instructions to proceed with a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- procedural default
- court dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:89
32 WP-5781-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5781 OF 2023
Moirae Generics Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Food and Drug & Anr. ...Respondents
——————
Mr. Prashant Mahajan i/b Mr. Kalpesh Patil for Petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Srivastava, AGP for Respondent-State.
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : JANUARY 13, 2026
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel for Petitioner submits that there are no
instructions received from Petitioner and as such, he is unable to
proceed further with the matter.
2. In view of the said submission, the Petition stands dismissed for
non-prosecution.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Sairaj 1 of 1
Checking your session…