Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASHWIN ANIL RAJE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 17 October 2018 in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or their counsel appeared for the hearing on 12 June 2026. The court noted that the petitioners had made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition since its filing. It was observed that the petitioners were not interested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and does not pursue a filed writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                             Sbw                                                   214-wp-5846-2018.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.5846 OF 2018

                     Ashwin Anil Raje & Ors.                                  … Petitioners

                               V/s.

                     The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                          … Respondents




                     None for the Petitioners.
                     Mr. Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     12th June 2026

                     P.C.:-

                     1)               None appears for Petitioners, when called out for hearing.

                     2)               Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                     17th October, 2018, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocate have taken

                     any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                     2.1)             It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

                     the Petition.

                     3)               Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
SANDHYA BHAGU
        WADHWA
BHAGU   Date:                                                                                             1/1
WADHWA 2026.06.22
          17:47:30
          +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.