Bombay High Court
VIJAY N. CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 September 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when called for hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by the bench comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and take any further steps?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- court procedure
Judgment
pmk 71-WP-6000-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6000 OF 2019
Vijay N. Chavan … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 25th June, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None appears for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the filing of the Petition on 18 th
September, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any
steps to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…