Bombay High Court
PRASHANT SUBHASH SURYAWANSHI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- ASHWIN D BHOBE
Holding
The writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous because the acquittal of the accused makes the challenge to the FIR moot.
Summary
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking the quashing of FIR No. I-295/2019 and the accompanying charge sheet. During the hearing, the petitioners and Respondent No.2 produced a copy of an order dated 09.01.2026 in which the accused were acquitted by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane. Both parties agreed that the acquittal rendered the petition to quash the FIR moot. The Court accepted this submission and held that the petitions were infructuous. Consequently, the Court dismissed both writ petitions.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR when the accused have already been acquitted?
Subjects
- quash FIR
- infructuous petition
- acquittal
- writ petition
- criminal procedure
Judgment
Gitalaxmi 501-WP-6011-2021+.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6011 OF 2021
Shri. Prashant Subhash Suryawanshi & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 372 OF 2023
Smt. Dhanashri Prashant Suryawanshi
@ Dhanashri Yuvraj Patil ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
__________
Ms. Ayushi Patil (Through VC) a/w Mr. Padmasinh Patil i/b Mr. Sameer
Prabhakar Mhatre, learned Advocates for the Petitioners.
Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
Mr. Onkar A. Wable, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
__________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 24th MARCH 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard Ms. Ayushi Patil, learned Advocate for the Petitioners,
Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent and Mr.
Onkar Wable, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
2. By the present Petitions, the Petitioners had sought for
quashing of the First Information Report bearing No. I-295/2019
registered with Kasarwadavli Police Station, Thane and the charge-
Page 1 of 2
Gitalaxmi 501-WP-6011-2021+.doc
sheet arising out of the said FIR.
3. Ms. Ayushi Patil, learned Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr.
Onkar Wable, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2 jointly tender
a photostat copy of the order dated 09.01.2026 passed by the
learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 11, Thane
in Regular Criminal Case No. 2236/2020, by which the accused
persons in the aforesaid FIR have been acquitted. Same is taken on
record and marked as “X” for identification. They therefore submit
that the challenge in the present Petitions is rendered infructuous.
4. Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent
confirms the said statement made by Ms. Ayushi Patil, learned
Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. Onkar Wable, learned
Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
5. In view of the statement made by the learned Advocates for
the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 and the order dated
09.01.2026 (X), both these Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.]
Digitally signed
by GITALAXMI
GITALAXMI KRISHNA
KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR
KOTAWADEKAR Date:
2026.03.25
11:33:14 +0530
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…