Bombay High Court

ANIL DHANRAJ JAINversusMAHENDRA SOMNATH SHIMPI (BAGUL) AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SACHIN S DESHMUKH

Holding

The writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed two writ petitions (Nos. 6076 and 6088 of 2014) challenging actions of the respondents. The petitioners' counsel failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 24 July 2026. The court recorded the absence of counsel and, after giving the petitioners an opportunity to appear, dismissed both writ petitions for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petitions were considered. The dismissal was entered as a procedural order.

Subjects

writ petition
dismissal
want of prosecution
procedural default
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:32329



                                                                   12 WP6076.2014+
                                              -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           12 WRIT PETITION NO. 6076 OF 2014
                                  ANIL DHANRAJ JAIN
                                        VERSUS
                  MAHENDRA SOMNATH SHIMPI (BAGUL) AND OTHERS
                                           ...
              Advocate for Respondents No.1&2 : Mr. Rahul S. Pawar
                                           ...

                                             WITH

                             WRIT PETITION NO. 6088 OF 2014
                                LOTAN SOMNATH BAGUL
                                        VERSUS
                  MAHENDRA SOMNATH SHIMPI (BAGUL) AND OTHERS
                                           ...
              Advocate for Respondents No.1&2 : Mr. Rahul S. Pawar
                                           ...

                                          CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                             Date : 31.07.2026

              PER COURT :-
              1.           On 24.07.2026, recording absence of the learned

              counsel for the Petitioners, the Petitions were posted for dismissal

              today. Even today, none present.


              2.           As such, the Writ Petitions are dismissed for want of

              prosecution.




                                                    (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
              marathe

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…