Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JAYESHKUMAR N. KAMLIversusTHE UT ADMINISTRATION OF DAMAN AND DIU AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Jayeshkumar N. Kamli filed a writ petition on 3 December 2019 challenging the actions of the UT Administration of Daman & Diu. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges of the Bombay High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • Bombay

Judgment

                      DTG                                                                  61-Wp-6090-2019.doc



                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 6090 OF 2019

                      Jayeshkumar N. Kamli                                               … Petitioner
                                     V/s.
                      The UT Administration Of Daman
                      & Diu & Ors.                                                       … Respondents
                                       _______________________________________
                      None for Petitioner.

                      Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                        _______________________________________

                                                         CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE  : 31st July 2026

                      P.C. :

                      1)                    None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)                    Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      3rd December 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                      2.1)                  It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)                    Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                            ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

               Digitally signed by
               DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR     Date: 2026.08.06
               18:19:39 +0530
                                                                                                                 1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.