Bombay High Court

VIJAY RAJAYYA DUBBAversusANUSUYA CHANDRAKANT DUBBA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Vijay Rajayya Dubba filed writ petition No. 6111 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Anusuya Chandrakant Dubba and others. The petition was listed for urgent orders on 27 January 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court again listed the matter on 2 February 2026, and once more the petitioner was absent. In view of the petitioner’s non‑appearance and lack of prosecution, the court dismissed the petition by default. The dismissal was recorded under the category of urgent orders, and the case was closed without any substantive hearing on the merits.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear?

Subjects

writ petition
default dismissal
want of prosecution
civil procedure
urgent orders

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:4458
                                                                          11-WP-6111-2021.odt


                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 11 WRIT PETITION NO. 6111 OF 2021

                                          Vijay Rajayya Dubba
                                                VERSUS
                                 Anusuya Chandrakant Dubba And Others

                                           …..
          Mr. Ashok R. Tapse, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3
                                           …..

                                             CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                             DATE       : 02.02.2026


          PER COURT :

          1.      On 27.01.2026, the following order was passed :

                        “1.      None for the petitioner.
                         2.      List the matter on 02/02/2026 for dismissal under
                                 the caption ‘Urgent Orders Category’.


          2.      Today also, when the matter is called, none appears for the
          Petitioner. Hence, the Petition is dismissed in default for want of
          prosecution.




                                                    [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]




          Sameer/February-2026




                                                    1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…