Bombay High Court
MADHAVRAO CHUNILAL RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and granted leave to do so.
Summary
The petitioners, Madhavrao Chunilal Rathod and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel Mr. Estling S. Murge, orally requested leave to withdraw the writ petition. The Court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted leave for the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was formally withdrawn by the petitioners. The Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn, concluding the matter.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners upon their request
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:3638-DB
909-WP-6115-25.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 WRIT PETITION NO. 6115 OF 2025
Madhavrao Chunilal Rathod And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
......
Mr. Estling S. Murge, Advocate for Petitioners
Mr.V.M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents
......
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 28 JANUARY, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Learned advocate Mr. Estling Murge for the appellant, upon oral
instructions from the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw the writ
petition.
2. Leave granted.
3. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
S P Rane
Checking your session…