Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIJAY SHRIRANG BABARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition was filed on 28 November 2019 by Vijay Shrirang Babar seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by the bench of Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure
  • failure to appear

Judgment

                     DTG                                                             64-Wp-6131-2019.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO. 6131 OF 2019

                     Vijay Shrirang Babar                                          … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                     The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                               … Respondents
                                          _______________________________________

                     None for Petitioner.

                     Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                       ______________________________________

                                                   CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                           KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE  : 31st July 2026

                     P.C. :

                     1)               None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                     2)               Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                     28th November 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                     steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                     2.1)             It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                     Petition.

                     3)               Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                      ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM   TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.08.06                                                                               1/1
            18:16:40 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.