Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH SAJID SHAIKH KHALIL AND ORSversusTHE JOINT DISTRICT REGISTRAR CLASS I

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Shaikh Sajid Shaikh Kalil & Ors., filed a civil writ petition challenging actions of the Joint District Registrar Class‑I and Stamp Collector, Nashik. The High Court directed the petitioners to approach the Chief Revenue Controlling Authority, Pune, for a merits‑based decision. The petitioners were given liberty to seek relief from that authority. Subsequently, on counsel's instructions, the petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw and ordered the petition to be disposed. No substantive merits of the original claim were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners should first approach the Chief Revenue Controlling Authority before proceeding with the writ petition
  • Whether the High Court can order withdrawal of a petition upon the petitioners' request

Subjects

  • civil writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • appellate authority
  • revenue law
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                                                       Digitally signed
                                                       by PALLAVI
                                                       MAHENDRA
                                            PALLAVI    WARGAONKAR
                                            MAHENDRA
                                            WARGAONKAR Date:
                                                       2026.05.13
                                                       20:54:50
                                                       +0530




                                                                                            9-wp-6135-2026.doc




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                     CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6135 of 2026


                   Shaikh Sajid Shaikh Kalil & Ors.                                      ...Petitioners.
                           Versus
                   The Joint District Registrar Class-I
                   & Stamp Collector Nashik                                              ...Respondents

                                                                  __________
                   Mr Darpan Bhatia i/by Ruju Gada for the Petitioners.
                   Mr AR Deolekar AGP for the State.
                                                                 __________

                                               CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA &
                                                       SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                               DATE                       : 13 MAY 2026
                                                                            (VACATION COURT)

                   P.C.:

                   1.      The matter was heard initially for some time. At the request of

                   the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, it was kept back to take

                   instructions. He has taken the instructions. He now informs that the

                   concerned Appellate Authority i.e. the Chief Revenue Controlling

                   Authority, Pune, is now available. The Petitioners are, therefore, at

                   liberty to approach the said Authority which would decide the

                   Application of the Petitioners on its own merits as expeditiously as

                   possible and in accordance with the law. We have not opined on

Chitra Sonawane.                                                                                     Page 1 of 2
                                                                         9-wp-6135-2026.doc


                   merits leaving open all contentions to be decided by the said

                   Appellate Authority.

                   2.    In view of the above, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners on

                   instructions, seeks to withdraw the Petition. Leave granted. The

                   Petition is disposed of, as withdrawn.



                   [SANDESH D. PATIL, J]                    [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]




Chitra Sonawane.                                                                  Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.