Bombay High Court
MANIKRAO SAMPAT JADHAV AND OTHERSversusMAROTI MANDIR VAVNA THROUGH MANAGING TRUSTEE ARCHK
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous due to the passage of time.
Summary
Manikrao Sampat Jadhav and others filed a writ petition (6 WRIT PETITION NO. 6142 OF 2021) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of Maroti Mandir Vavna through its Managing Trustee. The petition was argued by Ms. Sharaya Dhanture, holding out Mr. R. V. Gore as her senior. The Court examined the record and observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred since the filing of the petition. It held that the delay rendered the petition infructuous, meaning it could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition without granting any relief. The decision was delivered by Justice Siddheshwar S. Thombre on 17 February 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay rendering it infructuous
Subjects
- writ petition
- delay
- infructuous
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:6913
Dilwale 1 6-WP-6142-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
6 WRIT PETITION NO. 6142 OF 2021
Manikrao Sampat Jadhav & Others
VERSUS
Maroti Mandir Vavna Through Managing Trustee Archk
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Sharaya Dhanture h/f Mr. R. V. Gore
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 17.02.2026
PER COURT :
1. After going through the record, I find that due to passage of time,
the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The same is disposed of
accordingly.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Checking your session…