Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ALOKE GANESH CHATTERJEEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Aloke Ganesh Chatterjee, filed a writ petition on 6 December 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner when called for hearing. The court record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal order was signed by Justices Kamal Khata and A.S. Gadkari.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and take any steps to pursue the petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • BOMBAY High Court

Judgment

                     DTG                                                                   67-Wp-6156-2019.doc



                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 6156 OF 2019

                     Aloke Ganesh Chatterjee                                             … Petitioner
                                     V/s.
                     The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                                     … Respondents
                                                _______________________________________

                     None for Petitioner.

                     Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                      _______________________________________

                                                         CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE  : 31st July 2026

                     P.C. :

                     1)                     None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                     2)                     Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                     6th December 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                     steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                     2.1)                   It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                     Petition.

                     3)                     Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                            ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
               Digitally signed by
               DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR     Date: 2026.08.06
               18:21:13 +0530
                                                                                                                 1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.