Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

JANARDHAN JAGANNATH SATPUTE AND ANOTHERversusPANDIT BABURAO SONAWANE

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the earlier case RCS No.463/2015 has been decided, no relief remains and the petition is disposed.

Summary

The petitioners Janardhan Jagannath Satpute and another filed Writ Petition No. 6173 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Pandit Baburao Sonawane. The petitioners' counsel argued that the matter had already been decided in RCS No.463/2015, and therefore no issue remained for adjudication. The learned judge observed that the earlier decision was indeed final and that there was nothing left to consider in the present petition. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition. No substantive merits were examined as the case was deemed already settled.

Issues considered

  • Whether any relief remains for the petitioners after the decision in RCS No.463/2015

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • disposal
  • precedent
  • no relief

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12201
              Dilwale                                          1              15-WP-6173-19.odt




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                                   15 WRIT PETITION NO. 6173 OF 2019

                            Janardhan Jagannath Satpute And Another
                                               VERSUS
                                     Pandit Baburao Sonawane
                                                  ...
             Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Pradip S. Jadhav h/f Mr. Yogesh D. Kale
                                                  ...

                                       CORAM          : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                       DATE           : 18.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.         Learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that the RCS

             No.463/2015 is already decided. Therefore, nothing survives for

             consideration in this petition.

             2.         Hence, the petition is disposed of.


                                                              [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                        JUDGE


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.