Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

YUVRAJ NARAYAN PATILversusHONBLE MINISTER FOR STATE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT MUMBAI AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition was disposed of as there was nothing left for consideration.

Summary

A writ petition (No. 6206 of 2015) was filed by Yuvraj Narayan Patil against the Hon'ble Minister for State for Rural Development, Mumbai and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later informed the court that due to subsequent developments the petition had become infructuous and there was nothing left for adjudication. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition without further hearing. No substantive issues were addressed, and no legal provisions or precedents were cited. The disposition was a simple dismissal of the petition as it stood withdrawn.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • disposal
  • court procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:30375
                                                  1                    19-WP-6206-15.odt




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 6206 OF 2015

                                      YUVRAJ NARAYAN PATIL
                                              VERSUS
                HONBLE MINISTER FOR STATE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT MUMBAI
                                           AND OTHERS
                                                  ...
                 Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. S. S. Pathare h/f. Mr. M. S. Deshmukh
                       AGP for Respondents No.1 and 2: Mr. V. M. Jaware
                        Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Vinod P. Patil
                                                  ...

                                           CORAM :        SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                           DATE       :   22-07-2026
                PER COURT:-

                1.    The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

                submits that in view of subsequent developments, the petition is

                rendered infructuous and and nothing survives in the matter for

                consideration.

                2.    Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.




                                                  [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
                                                          JUDGE

                rrd


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.