Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AJAY JASWANT KUMBHARversusTHE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 10 December 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by the bench comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                          DTG                                                              73-Wp-6218-2019.doc



                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 6218 OF 2019

                          Ajay Jaswant Kumbhar                                           … Petitioner
                                     V/s.
                          The Government Of India & Ors.                                 … Respondents
                                                _______________________________________

                          None for Petitioner.

                          Mr. Shrikant V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                           _______________________________________

                                                         CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                         DATE  : 31st July 2026

                          P.C. :

                          1)                None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                          2)                Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                          10th December 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                          steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                          2.1)              It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                          Petition.

                          3)                Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                            ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

               Digitally signed by
               DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR     Date: 2026.08.06                                                                                     1/1
               18:22:30 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.