Bombay High Court
SAYYEDURRAHMAN ABDUL WAHAB KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Sayyedurrahman Abdul Wahab Khan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking mandamus orders for police protection, an independent investigation into an extortion call from jail, a status report on a FIR, and transfer of the investigation to the Crime Branch. The petition was filed against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the reliefs sought had become infructuous. The court, after noting the counsel's submission, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the reliefs were examined, and the petition was closed without any order directing the respondents.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal writ petition remains maintainable when the reliefs sought are rendered infructuous
Subjects
- mandamus
- police protection
- investigation
- extortion call
- criminal writ petition
- infructuous
Judgment
JVS 17-WP.6260.2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6260 OF 2025
Sayyedurrahman Abdul Wahab Khan } Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Mohammed Ahmed Shaikh with Mr. Asirur I.
Shaikh, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for Respondent No. 1
CORAM : SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ &
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
DATE : 4th MARCH 2026
P.C. :
The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
“a) Issue a writ of Mandamus to Respondent No. 2 directing them to
provide immediate police protection to the Petitioner;
b) Issue a writ of Mandamus to Respondent No. 2 & 3 directing an
independent and thorough investigation into the extortion call
received from jail premises, and to fix responsibility on officials
allowing such illegal communication;
c) Direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 to submit a status report on
the action taken in respect of the FIR lodged by the Petitioner;
d) Direct Respondent No. 4 to transfer the Investigation to Crime
Branch since the offence is very serious in nature;”
2. Mr. Mohammed Ahmed Shaikh, the learned counsel for the
petitioner states that the writ petition has now been rendered
infructuous.
3. Criminal Writ Petition No. 6260 of 2025 is dismissed as
infructuous.
JAYANT
VISHWANATH
SALUNKE
Digitally signed by
JAYANT
VISHWANATH
SALUNKE
Date: 2026.03.05
11:32:34 +0530
[GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]
1
Checking your session…