Bombay High Court
RAMA PANDURANG SARTAPEversusPANDURANG KISHANRAO SARTAPE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
Since the parties are identical, the petition is infructuous and is dismissed.
Summary
A writ petition (No. 6512 of 2015) was filed by Rama Pandurang Sartape against Pandurang Kishanrao Sartape. The petition was examined by the High Court at Aurangabad. The Court observed that the parties were ad idem, meaning there was no substantive dispute between them. Consequently, the Court held that the petition was infructuous. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable or infructuous
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34201
46 WP6512.2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
46 WRIT PETITION NO. 6512 OF 2015
RAMA PANDURANG SARTAPE
VERSUS
PANDURANG KISHANRAO SARTAPE
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Tandulkar h/f. Mr. Gajanan
G. Kadam
Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Aarti T. Gadge h/f. Mr. Dhananjay
M. Shinde
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
Date : 06.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Parties are ad idem that the Petition is rendered
infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
marathe
Checking your session…