Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAMA PANDURANG SARTAPEversusPANDURANG KISHANRAO SARTAPE

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the parties are identical, the petition is infructuous and is dismissed.

Summary

A writ petition (No. 6512 of 2015) was filed by Rama Pandurang Sartape against Pandurang Kishanrao Sartape. The petition was examined by the High Court at Aurangabad. The Court observed that the parties were ad idem, meaning there was no substantive dispute between them. Consequently, the Court held that the petition was infructuous. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable or infructuous

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34201



                                                                  46 WP6512.2015
                                              -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             46 WRIT PETITION NO. 6512 OF 2015

                               RAMA PANDURANG SARTAPE
                                            VERSUS
                            PANDURANG KISHANRAO SARTAPE
                                               ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Tandulkar h/f. Mr. Gajanan
              G. Kadam
              Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Aarti T. Gadge h/f. Mr. Dhananjay
              M. Shinde
                                               ...


                                          CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                             Date : 06.08.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.           Parties are ad idem that the Petition is rendered

              infructuous.


              2.           Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as

              infructuous.



                                                    (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.