Bombay High Court
VRANDAVANI BRAHMADEO SONNE AND ANOTHERSversusVACCHALABAI MAHADEO JADHAV AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as there was nothing left to adjudicate while the substantive suit remained pending.
Summary
The petitioners, Vranda... and others, filed a writ petition (953 WRIT PETITION NO. 669 of 2016) challenging the proceedings in Special Civil Suit No.2 of 2015. The petition argued that the suit was still pending before the trial court. The learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the suit was indeed at the argument stage. The court observed that since the substantive suit was still pending, the writ petition had no remaining ground for relief. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition, holding that nothing survived in the petition.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition is filed while the substantive civil suit is still pending before the trial court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- pending civil suit
- dismissal
- jurisdiction
- maintainability
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:8967
1 of 1 953-WP.669.2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
953 WRIT PETITION NO. 669 OF 2016
VRANDAVANI BRAHMADEO SONNE AND ANOTHERS
VERSUS
VACCHALABAI MAHADEO JADHAV AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Avinash D. Aghav, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. Valmik S. Munjal h/f. Mr. Vikram S. Undre, Advocate for
Respondent Nos.1 to 7.
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2026
P.C.:-
1. Mr. Aghav, learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that
the suit, i.e. Special Civil Suit No.2 of 2015 is now kept for arguments
before the Trial Court.
2. In view thereof, nothing survives in the present petition and
the same is disposed of.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
Tauseef
Checking your session…