Bombay High Court
SANDUKHA SUBHANKHA AND OTHERSversusNOORKHA RUSTAMKHA THROUGH GPA NYAMATKHA NOORKHA
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had already been decided.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition (924 WRIT PETITION NO. 6801 of 2015) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief related to Regular Civil Suit No.45/2013 pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Bhokardan. The petition alleged that the civil suit was still pending and required the court's intervention. During the pendency of the writ petition, the civil suit was finally decided on 28 June 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners informed the court of this development. The court held that, with the substantive suit already decided, the writ petition had no surviving cause of action and therefore dismissed it as infructuous.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the underlying civil suit on which it is based has already been decided?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit
- jurisdiction
- petition dismissed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24878
6801.2015WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
924 WRIT PETITION NO. 6801 OF 2015
SANDUKHA SUBHANKHA AND OTHERS
VERSUS
NOORKHA RUSTAMKHA THROUGH GPA NYAMATKHA
NOORKHA
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. R.O. Awasarmol
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 25.06.2026
P.C. :
1] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the present proceedings arise out of Regular Civil Suit
No.45/2013 pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division,
Bhokardan and that during pendency of the present petition,
the suit itself has been decided on 28.06.2023.
2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the
petition. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…