Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

CITIZEN URDU PRIMARY SCHOOL, THR. ITS PRESIDENT AND ANOTHERversusSHABBIR AHMED BASHEER AHMED TAKE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous because it is barred by the lapse of time.

Summary

The Citizen Urdu Primary School, through its president, filed a writ petition (No. 6846 of 2014) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Shabbir Ahmed Basheer Ahmed Take and others. The petition sought relief, but counsel for the petitioner, Mr. G. R. Syed, submitted that the passage of time had rendered the petition infructuous. The court examined the argument that the delay barred any effective remedy. Relying on the principle that a petition must be timely to be maintainable, the bench held that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous, with no substantive merits addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is barred by limitation due to the passage of time?

Subjects

  • limitation
  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • court procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:32338



                                                                   6 WP6846.2014
                                              -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              6 WRIT PETITION NO. 6846 OF 2014

               CITIZEN URDU PRIMARY SCHOOL, THR. ITS PRESIDENT AND
                                          ANOTHER
                                            VERSUS
                 SHABBIR AHMED BASHEER AHMED TAKE AND OTHERS
                                               ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. G. R. Syed
                                               ...

                                          CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                             Date : 31.07.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.           Mr. G. R. Syed, learned counsel for the Petitioner

              submits that by passage of time the Petition is rendered

              infructuous.


              2.           Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as

              infructuous.




                                                    (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.