Bombay High Court
VISHNU PRATAP PATILversusTHE RETURNIN OFFICER AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SACHIN S DESHMUKH
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because of the passage of time.
Summary
Vishnu, son of Pratap Patil, filed a writ petition (No. 6862 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Latur. The respondents were the Returning Officer for that election and other officials. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The Court examined whether the delay rendered the petition non‑maintainable. Relying on the submission that the cause of action had effectively lapsed, the Court held the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition becomes infructuous and non‑maintainable due to undue delay.
Subjects
- writ petition
- election
- Agricultural Produce Market Committee
- delay
- infructuous
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:32575
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6862 OF 2015
Vishnu s/o Pratap Patil … PETITIONER
VERSUS
The Returning Officer for the Election of
Agricultural Produce Market Committee,
Latur & ors. … RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. V.M. Jawre, A.G.P. for State
....…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 31st JULY, 2026
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
submits that, by passage of time, the present petition is rendered
infructuous. As such, the petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…