Bombay High Court
DHANANJAY ONKAR PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court quashed the impugned orders and directed transfer of the petitioners' applications to a competent court under Section 28‑A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with consideration of interest and set‑off.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained three writ petitions filed by Devendra Walsing Patil, Dhananjay Onkar Patil and Narayan Shankar Rawate challenging orders dated 22‑08‑2019 issued by Respondent No.3 in land‑acquisition proceedings. Relying on its earlier decision in Writ Petition No.6789 of 2024, the Court held that the impugned orders were unlawful and quashed them. It directed that the petitioners' applications dated 12‑09‑2017 be restored to Respondent No.3’s file and transferred to a competent court under Section 28‑A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 within 21 days. The Court further ordered that the claim for interest be considered, any amount already paid with interest be set off against the final liability, and that the competent court deliver a decision within six months. Consequently, the writ petitions were allowed with the above directions.
Issues considered
- Whether the orders dated 22‑08‑2019 passed by Respondent No.3 are valid under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
- Whether the petitioners' applications should be transferred to a competent court under Section 28‑A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to interest on the amount due and whether set‑off of amounts already paid is permissible.
Legislation cited
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — s. 28-A(3)
Subjects
- land acquisition
- Section 28-A
- quashing order
- interest entitlement
- set‑off
- competent court
- writ petition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:45597-DB
1 8-WP-5591-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
8 WRIT PETITION NO. 5591 OF 2024
DEVENDRA WALSING PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. Kumar Gaurav M. More, Advocate for the Petitioner
Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents/State
...
17 WRIT PETITION NO. 6945 OF 2024
DHANANJAY ONKAR PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. Kumar Gaurav M. More, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents/State
...
21 WRIT PETITION NO. 7089 OF 2024
NARAYAN SHANKAR RAWATE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. Kumar Gaurav M. More, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Indisputably, the issue raised in these petitions is
squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Writ
Petition No.6789 of 2024 [Kailas Ziparu Patil (Dead) Through LRs.
Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others].
SVH
2 8-WP-5591-24.odt
2. For the reasons stated in the said order, the writ
petitions are allowed with following directions:-
ORDER
(a) The impugned orders passed by Respondent No.3, dated
22/08/2019, are quashed and set aside.
(b) The applications of these Petitioners dated 12/09/2017,
shall stand restored to the file of Respondent No.3, who
shall forthwith transfer the said applications to the
Court of competent jurisdiction in view of Section 28-
A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, within a period
of twenty one (21) days from today.
(c) The competent Court shall follow the due procedure as
is laid down in law while dealing with the said
application, keeping in view the earlier judgment dated
02/05/2017, which was delivered nine years ago.
(d) Consequentially, we also direct that the claim of the
Petitioners as regards the interest component as is
permissible in law, shall also be considered by the
Court while dealing with the applications of these
Petitioners.
(e) Needless to state, the amount which is already received
by the Petitioners along with the interest component,
may be set off against the amount which is now liable
to be paid to the Petitioners with accrued interest.
SVH
3 8-WP-5591-24.odt
(f) Since the competent Court has already delivered the
judgment on 02/05/2017, we would expect an early
decision by the said Court with regard to the claim of
the Petitioners (all legal heirs of the original Claimant)
and preferably within a period of six months from
today.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…