Bombay High Court
MRS. MEENA DILIPRAO PAYGUDEversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed in default due to the petitioner's non-appearance.
Summary
Mrs. Meena Diliprao Paygude filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging a decision of the Union of India and the Defence Estate Officer. The petitioner failed to appear before the Court on the scheduled date. The Court noted the non-appearance and proceeded to consider the petition in the absence of the petitioner. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition in default. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence of a petitioner's failure to appear before the Court?
Subjects
- default judgment
- non-appearance
- writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
37-WP-6991-2018.docx
rrpillai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6991 OF 2018
Mrs. Meena Diliprao Paygude … Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India through … Respondents
Defence Estate Officer and Anr.
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 4th MARCH 2026
ORDER :
1. None appears for the petitioner.
2. The writ petition is dismissed in default.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
Digitally signed
by
RAJESHWARI
RAJESHWARI RAMESH
RAMESH PILLAI
PILLAI Date:
2026.03.06
10:53:10
+0530 1/1
Checking your session…