Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRATIBHA SAMBHAJI SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Pratibha Sambhaji Shinde, filed a writ petition on 3 February 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No steps were taken by the petitioner or her counsel to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not be proceeded with due to lack of prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution

Subjects

  • Writ Petition
  • Non-prosecution
  • Dismissal
  • Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

               DTG                                                            104-Wp-702-2020.doc



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 702 OF 2020

               Pratibha Sambhaji Shinde                                     … Petitioner
                        V/s.
               The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                              … Respondents
                                   _______________________________________

               None for Petitioner.

               Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                _______________________________________

                                            CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                    KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                            DATE  : 31st July 2026

               P.C. :

               1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

               2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

               3rd February 2020, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any

               steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

               2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

               Petition.

               3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                               ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM   TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.08.06
            18:35:16 +0530                                                                          1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.