Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAGANBHAI VESTABHAI BARAF AND ORSversusUNION TERRITORY OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. ( THR. THE ADMINI. ) OF D. AND N.H. AND D.D. AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The status quo order shall continue to operate until the pronouncement of the pending Exhibit ‘5’ application.

Summary

The petitioners sought an extension of a status quo order that had been repeatedly continued since 23 April 2026, pending the final decision on their Exhibit ‘5’ application scheduled for 15 June 2026. The Civil Judge, Senior Division, Silvassa, adjourned the matter without extending the status quo, prompting the petitioners to file a writ petition. The High Court examined whether it was just and equitable to allow the status quo to remain in force until the pending application is decided. The Court held that, in the interest of justice, the status quo should continue until the pronouncement of the pending order. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of, directing the continuation of the status quo and ordering no costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can order the continuation of a status quo order pending the final decision on an application.
  • Whether it is just, fair, and equitable to extend the status quo in the circumstances presented.

Subjects

  • status quo
  • writ petition
  • interim order
  • extension of interim relief
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural fairness

Judgment

                                                                                                                     6. WP-7116-2026.doc
                                                                                               Maganbhai & Ors. vs. Union Territory & Ors.


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 7116 OF 2026

                      Maganbhai Vestabhai Baraf And Ors                   ..   Petitioners
                         V/s.
                      Union Territory Of D. And N.H.
                      And D.D. ( Thr. The Admini. ) Of
                      D. And N.H. And D.D. And Ors                        ..   Respondents
                                        ______________________________________


                      Mr. Abhishek Matkar, for the Petitioners.
                      Mr. Girish Agrawal, (through VC), for Respondent no. 4.
                                      _______________________________________
                                                         CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.

                                                         DATE                 : 5th JUNE 2026
                                                                                (VACATION COURT)
                      P.C.:

                      1.      The present Writ Petition impugns an order dated 1 st June 2026 passed by
                              the Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Silvassa who has not passed any
                              orders in the Application below Exhibit ‘48’ for extension of status quo

AMOL
                              preferred by the Petitioners herein and simplicitor adjourned the matter to
PREMNATH
JADHAV                        15th June 2026.
Digitally signed by
AMOL PREMNATH
JADHAV                2.      It is not in dispute that the Petitioners’ Exhibit ‘5’ Application was argued
Date: 2026.06.05
18:05:28 +0530
                              and closed for orders on 16th April 2026. Thereafter, on 23rd April 2026, the
                              Petitioners’ Application at Exhibit ‘43’ for grant of status quo till the final
                              disposal of his Exhibit ‘5’ Application was allowed and a status quo order
                              was passed till 27th April 2026. This status quo order was thereafter
                              continued from time to time until 1 st June 2026 on which date, the
                              Petitioners once again filed a fresh Application below Exhibit ‘48’ for
                              extension of the status quo order till the pronouncement of the order on the


                                                                   Page 1 of 2
                                                       -------------------------------------
                                                          Order dated 5th June 2026
                                                                                              6. WP-7116-2026.doc
                                                                        Maganbhai & Ors. vs. Union Territory & Ors.


       Exhibit ‘5’ Application. It is under these circumstances that the impugned
       order came to be passed on 1 st June 2026 and the matter was simplicitor
       adjourned to 15th June 2026 without continuation of the status quo order.

3.     This Court is informed that the Petitioners’ Exhibit ‘5’ Application is placed
       for pronouncement of order on 15th June 2026. In the circumstances, it
       would be just, fair and equitable and in the interests of justice that the status
       quo order that was earlier passed on 23 rd April 2026 and which has been in
       force since then till 1st June 2026 shall continue to operate until the
       pronouncement of the order on the Exhibit ‘5’ Application filed by the
       Petitioner.

4.     The present Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the above order. There
       shall be no order as to costs.




                                                             ( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. )
Amol




                                            Page 2 of 2
                                -------------------------------------
                                   Order dated 5th June 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.