Bombay High Court
KALAMUDDIN USMAN SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Kalamuddin Usman Shaikh, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after June 19, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. Relying on the petitioner’s non‑appearance and lack of action, the court dismissed the petition. The dismissal was entered on the basis that the petitioner did not prosecute the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to pursue the petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
- BOMBAY High Court
Judgment
DTG 53-wp72.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 72 OF 2019
Kalamuddin Usman Shaikh … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
_______________________________________
None for Petitioner.
Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
_______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 17th June 2026
P.C. :
1) None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 19th June 2019, neither the Petitioner
nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…