Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NEELVASTU HOLIDAY RESORTS AND PROPERTIES AURANGABADversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn in accordance with the petitioner's written instructions.

Summary

The petitioner, Neelvastu Holiday Resorts And Properties, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. After filing, the petitioner submitted written instructions to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the written instruction as annexure X. Upon reviewing the withdrawal request, the court accepted the petitioner's desire to discontinue the proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:31186-DB


                                                 1               15-wp 7315-2010.odt



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 7315 OF 2010

                 Neelvastu Holiday Resorts And Properties,
                 Aurangabad                                                 .. Petitioner

                          Versus

                 The State of Maharashtra and Another                       .. Respondents

                 Ms. Tanishqa Shirsath, Advocate h/f Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate
                 for Petitioner.
                 Smt. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent No. 1.
                 Ms. Shital S. Karle, Advocate h/f Smt. Anjali Dube, Advocate for
                 Respondent No. 2.

                                          CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                  AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
                                          DATE       :   27th JULY, 2026.
                 PER COURT :-
                 1.       The learned advocate for the petitioner has produced on

                 record written instructions of the petitioner seeking withdrawal of

                 the present petition. The copy of written instructions is taken on

                 record and marked as annexure “X” for the purpose of

                 identification.

                 2.       In view of written instructions, the writ petition stands

                 disposed of as withdrawn.


                 ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.)                    ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )

                 P.S.B.


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.