Bombay High Court
BALASAHEB DADASAHEB PATILversus1. SHRI KONDIBA APPA NARUTE AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Sayali Deepak, filed a writ petition (No. 7320 of 2012) before the High Court of Bombay challenging proceedings related to a no‑confidence motion that took place in 2012. The petition sought relief on the basis that the earlier proceedings were allegedly flawed. The Court observed that the matters raised in the writ petition had already been fully resolved in the earlier no‑confidence motion proceedings and that no substantive question remained for adjudication. Consequently, the Court held that the petition was infructuous. The petition was therefore disposed of without any costs being awarded.
Issues considered
- What, if any, substantive question remains for adjudication in the writ petition arising from the 2012 no‑confidence motion?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- no confidence motion
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- disposal of petition
Judgment
53-WP-7320-12.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SAYALI WRIT PETITION NO. 7320 OF 2012
DEEPAK
UPASANI
Digitally signed by
Balasaheb Dadasaheb Patil … Petitioner
SAYALI DEEPAK V/s.
UPASANI
Date: 2026.03.04
16:54:21 +0530 State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents
Mr. Shubham Paygude i/b Mr. Sandeep Salunkhe, for
Petitioner.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : MARCH 04, 2026
P.C.:
1. The petition arises out of proceedings of no confidence
motion of the year 2012. Hence, nothing remains to be
adjudicated in the present writ petition.
2. The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No
costs.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…