Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BALASAHEB DADASAHEB PATILversus1. SHRI KONDIBA APPA NARUTE AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is infructuous and is disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Sayali Deepak, filed a writ petition (No. 7320 of 2012) before the High Court of Bombay challenging proceedings related to a no‑confidence motion that took place in 2012. The petition sought relief on the basis that the earlier proceedings were allegedly flawed. The Court observed that the matters raised in the writ petition had already been fully resolved in the earlier no‑confidence motion proceedings and that no substantive question remained for adjudication. Consequently, the Court held that the petition was infructuous. The petition was therefore disposed of without any costs being awarded.

Issues considered

  • What, if any, substantive question remains for adjudication in the writ petition arising from the 2012 no‑confidence motion?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • no confidence motion
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • disposal of petition

Judgment

                                                                           53-WP-7320-12.doc



                                                                                 Sayali


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SAYALI                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 7320 OF 2012
DEEPAK
UPASANI
Digitally signed by
                      Balasaheb Dadasaheb Patil                   … Petitioner
SAYALI DEEPAK                    V/s.
UPASANI
Date: 2026.03.04
16:54:21 +0530        State of Maharashtra and Others             … Respondents

                      Mr. Shubham Paygude i/b Mr. Sandeep Salunkhe, for
                      Petitioner.



                                                  CORAM     : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                  DATED     : MARCH 04, 2026

                      P.C.:

                      1.       The petition arises out of proceedings of no confidence
                      motion of the year 2012. Hence, nothing remains to be
                      adjudicated in the present writ petition.

                      2.       The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No
                      costs.


                                                                  (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                                       1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.