Bombay High Court
APPASAHEB WALMIK KASHID AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- S G CHAPALGAONKAR
Holding
The Court held that the writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to pursue an alternate remedy.
Summary
The petitioners, Appasaheb Walmik Kashid and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ petition, asking that the court grant them liberty to pursue an alternate remedy as permitted by law. The respondent's counsel opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined whether a writ petition could be withdrawn with such liberty. Finding no legal impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to avail an alternate remedy.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to avail an alternate remedy
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- alternate remedy
- high court
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:26617
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
948 WRIT PETITION NO. 7323 OF 2026
APPASAHEB WALMIK KASHID AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
......
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar Abdulhamid
AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. K. S. Hoke Patil
Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 & 5: Mr. Madhav M. Bhokarikar
...…
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED : 07th JULY, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The learned Advocate appearing for petitioners after
arguing for some time seeks permission to withdraw writ petition
with liberty to avail alternate remedy as permissible under law.
2. Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty
as prayed.
(S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR)
JUDGE
Tandale
Checking your session…