Bombay High Court

THE FASHION MARKET VYAPARI WELFARE ASSCIATION THROU ITS PRESIDENTversusTHE PUNE CANTONMENT BOARD THROU ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS

Decided: 4 March 2026
Disposal: Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Bench: GAURI GODSE

Holding

The writ petition was held to be infructuous and dismissed.

Summary

The Fashion Market Vyapari Welfare Association, through its President, filed Writ Petition No. 7354 of 2018 against the Pune Cantonment Board and its Executive Officer. The petition sought relief challenging an order that had been passed in a civil appeal. Respondents submitted that the impugned order had already been disposed of on 16 March 2020, attaching a copy of the judgment. The Court examined the submission and found that the matter was already finally decided. Consequently, the writ petition was held to be infructuous and was dismissed.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the order it challenges has already been disposed of in a civil appeal

Subjects

writ petition
civil appeal
infructuous
Pune Cantonment Board
jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AS:10604

                                                               41-WP-7354-2018.docx


                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
     Swapnil
                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 7354 OF 2018
               The Fashion Market Vyapari Welfare
               Assciation Throu Its President.            …    Petitioner
                    Vs.
               The Pune Cantonment Board Through
               Its Executive Officer and Ors.             …    Respondents

               None for the petitioner.
               Mr. Ashok Tajane, Ms. Ashwini Mehetre for respondent nos. 1
               and 2.

                                          CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

                                          DATE :      4th MARCH 2026

               ORDER :


               1.    None for the petitioner.


               2.    Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the

               impugned order is passed in a civil appeal which is disposed

               of on 16th March 2020. He has tendered a copy of the

               judgment which is taken on record.


               3.    The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.




                                                           [GAURI GODSE, J.]


                                                1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…