Bombay High Court
BASHIR MOHDDINSAB SHAIKHversusUMAKANT SHIVRAM DANGE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and must be disposed of because the trial court has already decided the underlying suit.
Summary
The petitioner, Bashir Mohdinsab Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the respondent, Umakant Shivram Dange. The petitioner sought relief despite the existence of a pending suit. The respondent contended that the trial court had already decided the suit, rendering the writ petition moot. The Court examined whether any issue remained for adjudication in the writ petition. Finding that the trial court's decision exhausted the dispute, the Court held that the petition was infructuous and ordered its disposal.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the substantive suit has already been decided by the trial court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- trial court decision
- civil procedure
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:6332
1 50-WP-7397-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7397 OF 2023
BASHIR MOHDDINSAB SHAIKH
VERSUS
UMAKANT SHIVRAM DANGE
...
Mr. Tanvi S. Pujari, h/f Mr. Parag Vijay Barde, Advocate for
Respondent
...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
Date : 12TH FEBRUARY, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Learned counsel for respondent submits that the Trial
Court has already decide the suit, hence, nothing survives in the
present petition.
2. Writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…