Bombay High Court

RAJENDRA LAHANU TULEversusFULABAI PADNURANG KOLTE AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The Court held that the writ petitions were infructuous and ordered their disposal.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajendra Lahanu Tule, filed writ petitions (909 WRIT PETITION NO. 7544 of 2016 and WRIT PETITION NO. 7499 of 2016) in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the respondents. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Pravin D. Biradar, appearing on behalf of Mr. Rajendra S. Kasar. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petitions had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no remaining cause of action. Consequently, the Court disposed of both writ petitions as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits.

Issues considered

The petitions had become infructuous and whether they should be dismissed on that ground

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
disposal
High Court of Bombay
jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12017
             Dilwale                                       1                   909-WP-7544-16.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 909 WRIT PETITION NO. 7544 OF 2016

                                      Rajendra Lahanu Tule
                                            VERSUS
                              Fulabai Padnurang Kolte And Another
                                                ...
             Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin D. Biradar h/f Mr. Rajendra S
             Kasar
                                                ...

                                                WITH
                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 7499 OF 2016
                                                 ….

                                      CORAM          : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE           : 18.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.        Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the petitions have

             become infructuous.

             2.        In view thereof, petitions are disposed of as infructuous.


                                                          [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                    JUDGE

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…