Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DATTATREYA BALWANT PADWALversusTHE SATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. LAND ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION DEPT.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Dattatreya Balwant Padwal and others filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. Their counsel, Mr. Nilesh Wable, applied for permission to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. The Court also noted that any pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. It further indicated that petitioners may pursue separate remedies for enhancement of compensation if they have grievances regarding the quantum of compensation.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioners' request

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • compensation

Judgment

                                                                                             8_WP7529_26.doc



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                              WRIT PETITION NO.7529 OF 2026

                          Dattatreya Balwant Padwal and others                     …      Petitioners
                          Vs.
                          State of Maharashtra and others                          …      Respondents

                          Mr. Nilesh Wable for Petitioner.
                          Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. GP a/w. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for Respondents-State.


                                                       CORAM : MANISH PITALE &
                                                               SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
                                                       DATE      : JUNE 25, 2026

                          P.C. :

                          .        Mr. Wable, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions,
                          seeks permission to withdraw this petition.

                          2.       The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

                          3.       Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.

                          4.       If the petitioners have any grievance with regard to the quantum
                          of compensation, they are at liberty to pursue their remedies for
                          enhancement of compensation in accordance with law.




MINAL Digitally signed
                          (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)                          (MANISH PITALE, J.)
       by MINAL
SANDIP SANDIP   PARAB
       Date: 2026.06.25
PARAB 17:31:16 +0530




                          Minal Parab




                                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.