Bombay High Court

RAJENDRA LAHANU TULEversusFULABAI PADNURANG KOLTE AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The writ petitions are deemed infructuous and are disposed of accordingly.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajendra Lahanu Tule, filed writ petitions No. 7544 of 2016 and No. 7499 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against respondents Fulabai Padnurang Kolte and another. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the petitions should be entertained. The Court examined the status of the petitions and found that they had become infructuous, likely due to lapse of time or a change in circumstances. No substantive merits were addressed because the petitions no longer required adjudication. Consequently, the Court ordered that both writ petitions be disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

The petitions have become infructuous and therefore should be dismissed

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
disposal
High Court
Bombay High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:12016
             Dilwale                                       1                   909-WP-7544-16.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 909 WRIT PETITION NO. 7544 OF 2016

                                      Rajendra Lahanu Tule
                                            VERSUS
                              Fulabai Padnurang Kolte And Another
                                                ...
             Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin D. Biradar h/f Mr. Rajendra S
             Kasar
                                                ...

                                                WITH
                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 7499 OF 2016
                                                 ….

                                      CORAM          : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE           : 18.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.        Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the petitions have

             become infructuous.

             2.        In view thereof, petitions are disposed of as infructuous.


                                                          [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                    JUDGE

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…