Bombay High Court
TRIAMBAK KISAN RANDHAVANE THROUGH ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JANARDHAN TRIAMBAK RANDHAWANEversusAPPASAHEB BHIKAJI NAVALE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was held to be infructuous and was disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Triambak Kisan Randhavane, filed a writ petition challenging a matter that was concurrently pending in a regular civil suit (No. 883/2012) before the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Rahata. During the pendency of the writ petition, the civil suit was disposed of on 28 August 2017. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the disposal of the civil suit rendered the writ petition moot. The Court examined whether any relief could still be claimed after the underlying suit’s disposal. Finding that no issue remained, the Court held the writ petition infructuous and ordered its disposal.
Issues considered
- What is the effect on a writ petition when the substantive civil suit it concerns is disposed of before the petition is decided?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit disposal
- jurisdiction
- petition dismissed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24883
7603.2015WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
927 WRIT PETITION NO. 7603 OF 2015
TRIAMBAK KISAN RANDHAVANE THROUGH ITS POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER JANARDHAN TRIAMBAK
RANDHAWANE
VERSUS
APPASAHEB BHIKAJI NAVALE
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv. Pranali Shinde h/f Mr. Sanket
Kulkarni
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 25.06.2026
P.C. :
1] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
during the pendency of this petition, Regular Civil Suit
No.883/2012 pending before the 3 rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior
Division, Rahata is disposed of on 28.08.2017.
2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the
petition. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…