Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRABHAVATI MALKARI MAHAJAN AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The petition stands disposed of as infructuous because the petitioners were acquitted.

Summary

The petitioners, Prabhavati Malkari Mahajan and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the trial proceedings. The trial concluded with the acquittal of all petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners informed the Court of the acquittal. The Court held that, in view of the acquittal, the writ petition was rendered infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as infructuous without further hearing.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous after the petitioners have been acquitted in the trial.

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • acquittal
  • infructuous
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                                                      32-WP-768-2020 (CR).doc




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 768 OF 2020

                        Prabhavati Malkari Mahajan and others           ]        Petitioners
                              Vs.
                        State of Maharashtra and another                ]        Respondents

                                                     .....
                        Mr. Darshan Singh Rajpurohit i/b Ritesh Thobde,                Advocate for
                        Petitioners.
           Digitally
           signed by
           SHAILAJA     Ms. Priyanka Rane, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1 – State.
SHAILAJA   SHRIKANT
SHRIKANT   HALKUDE
HALKUDE    Date:                                           ….
           2026.06.24
           13:00:49
           +0530


                                                              CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
                                                              DATED: 22nd JUNE 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.         Mr. Rajpurohit, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

                        states that the trial proceeded and all the petitioners were acquitted.

                        Therefore, this writ petition is rendered infructuous.



                        2.          In view of the statement made by Mr. Rajpurohit, petition

                        stands disposed of as infructuous.


                                                                        [SANDESH D. PATIL, J.]




                        Shailaja                          1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.