Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SONI PRASADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Soni Prasad, filed a writ petition on 7 February 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No hearing attendance or any steps to circulate the petition were taken by the petitioner or her counsel since filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was ordered by a bench comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s inaction?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                          DTG                                                               107-Wp-769-2020.doc



                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 769 OF 2020

                               Soni Prasad                                                … Petitioner
                                    V/s.
                          The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                 … Respondents
                                                 _______________________________________

                          None for Petitioner.

                          Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                            _______________________________________

                                                          CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                  KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                          DATE  : 31st July 2026

                          P.C. :

                          1)                 None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                          2)                 Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                          7th February 2020, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any

                          steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                          2.1)               It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                          Petition.

                          3)                 Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                             ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM   TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.08.06
                                                                                                                  1/1
            18:36:36 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.