Bombay High Court
BAJIRAO RAGHUNATH VANJARIversusKEVALBAI HIMATRAO PATIL AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and must be dismissed because the substantive civil suit has been disposed.
Summary
Bajirao Raghunath Vanjari filed writ petition No. 7704 of 2015 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking relief against respondents including Kevalbai Himatrao Patil. During the pendency of the petition, the regular civil suit No. 3 of 2005, which was pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chalisgaon, was finally disposed. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the disposal of the civil suit rendered the writ petition moot. The Court examined whether any relief could still be granted in the writ petition after the substantive suit’s conclusion. Finding that the civil suit’s disposal eliminated the basis of the petition, the Court held the writ petition to be infructuous and ordered its disposal.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the regular civil suit pending in the lower court has been disposed.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit disposal
- jurisdiction
- petition dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24882
7704.2015WP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 WRIT PETITION NO. 7704 OF 2015
BAJIRAO RAGHUNATH VANJARI
VERSUS
KEVALBAI HIMATRAO PATIL AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. P.B. Patil
Advocate for Respondent nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 : Mr. Ujwal S. Patil
...
CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.
DATE : 25.06.2026
P.C. :
1] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
during the pendency of this petition, Regular Civil Suit
No.3/2005 pending before the Civil Judge, Junior Division,
Chalisgaon is disposed of.
2] In view of the same, nothing survives in the
petition. The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]
JUDGE
SGA
Checking your session…