Bombay High Court
MR. ABDUL KADAR HUSSAIN BHAI ATTAR (EXPIRED) THROUGH HIS L.R.versusBANUBAI MOHSINBHAI BHORI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER L.R.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous because the underlying appeal has already been disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a civil miscellaneous appeal (No. 672 of 2008) decided by the District Court. The court clerk retrieved the case status from the website, which showed that the appeal had already been disposed of. Since the subject matter of the petition was already resolved, the High Court found the writ petition to be infructuous. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without further hearing. The order reflects procedural disposal rather than a substantive adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition challenging a civil appeal remains maintainable when the appealed order has already been disposed of
Subjects
- writ petition
- civil miscellaneous appeal
- infructuous
- disposal
- procedural dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:2669
26-WP-7817-2016.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Swapnil WRIT PETITION NO. 7817 OF 2016
Abdul Kadar Hussain Bhai
Attar (Expired) Through His
L.R. … Petitioner
Vs.
Banubai Mohsinbhai Bhori
(Since Deceased) Through Her
L.R. … Respondent
None for the petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 28th JANUARY 2026
ORDER :
1. The impugned order is passed in Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal No. 672 of 2008 before the District Court. A copy of
the case status of the appeal taken by the court clerk from
the website is taken on record. The case status shows that
the appeal is disposed of.
2. The writ petition is therefore disposed of as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
1/1
Checking your session…