Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAKASH MURLIDHAR MATEversusASHOK SAHAKARI KARKHANA LTD AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

Petitioner Prakash Murlidhar Mate filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Ashok Sahakari Karkhana Ltd. and others. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the dispute had already been settled between the parties. Consequently, there was no substantive relief left to be granted. The Court examined the submission that the matter was fully resolved. Finding no pending issues, the Court held the petition to be infructuous and ordered its disposal. All pending civil applications, if any, were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is infructuous and should be disposed of

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • disposal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:9951
                                                   1                          60 WP 7828-2017.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 60 WRIT PETITION NO. 7828 OF 2017

                               PRAKASH MURLIDHAR MATE
                                        VERSUS
                  ASHOK SAHAKARI KARKHANA LTD AHMEDNAGAR AND OTHERS

                                                   …
             Mr. S.S. Bora – Advocate for Petitioner
             Mr. P.J. Sagalgile h/f. Mr. R.R. Karpe – Advocate for Respondent No.1
                                                   …

                                      CORAM         : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE          : 09.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.       Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has

             already been settled and, therefore, nothing survives for consideration in

             the present petition.


             2.       In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.


             3.       Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.




                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE


             Pooja Kale/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.