Bombay High Court
SEEMA RAMESH MORE AND ORSversusESTATE MANAGER BANDRA DIVISION ( TRANSIT CAMP ) AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 7829 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court. The matter was listed under the caption “For Dismissal,” but the petitioners failed to appear before the court. The court noted the absence of the petitioners despite multiple listings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The order directs that any further actions be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy from the court’s website.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when petitioners fail to appear for a listed hearing in a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- civil procedure
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
18.WP.7829.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7829 OF 2024
Seema Ramesh More & Ors. ….Petitioners
Versus
Estate Manager Bandra Division
(Transit Camp) & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Hrishikesh Nabar h/f. Dr. Uday Warunjikar, for
Respondent Nos.1 to 3-MHADA.
Mr. Kaustubh Patil a/w. Roshan Sawant, for Respondent No.4.
Smt. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP for State.
CORAM: SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.
DATE : JANUARY 28, 2026
ORDER :
1. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For
Dismissal”, none appears for the Petitioners yet again.
2. The Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be
taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court’s
website.
[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
Digitally
signed by
AARTI
AARTI
GAJANAN
Page 1 of 1
GAJANAN PALKAR
PALKAR Date: JANUARY 28, 2026
2026.01.30
12:25:03 Aarti Palkar
+0530
Checking your session…