Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHOEB M. ZUBER ANSARI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 16 February 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No petitioner appeared when called for hearing, and the record shows that the petitioners or their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition at any time. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on 18 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when petitioners fail to appear and do not take steps to advance a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                         sbw                                                     219-wp-790-2018.doc

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO.790 OF 2018

                    Shoeb M. Zuber Ansari & Ors.                            … Petitioners

                             V/s.

                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                         … Respondents




                    None for the Petitioners.
                    Mr. Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                     KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                          DATE :     18th April 2026

                    P.C.:-

                    1)              None for the Petitioners when called out for hearing.

                    2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                    16th February, 2018, the Petitioners and/or their Advocate have not taken

                    any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                    2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

                    the Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                               (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                      (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


       Digitally
       signed by
       SANDHYA
                                                                                                       1/1
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
       2026.04.23
       12:02:10
       +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.