Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AMBRUSHI LAXMAN SONAWANE AND OTHERSversusTHE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Both writ petitions were disposed of in accordance with the Court’s order dated 06‑08‑2018.

Summary

The petitioners, Ambrushi Laxman Sonawane and others, filed writ petitions No. 8120 and 8121 of 2017 against the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad and other respondents. The matters were listed before the High Court, Aurangabad Bench, and were heard by the Court. The Court referred to its earlier order dated 06‑08‑2018 and, on that basis, disposed of both writ petitions. The order further directed that any pending civil applications, if any, stand disposed of. No further directions or reliefs were granted.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • disposal
  • high court
  • Aurangabad

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:9920
                                                   1                          62 WP 8120-2017.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 62 WRIT PETITION NO. 8120 OF 2017
                                               WITH
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 8121 OF 2017

                          AMBRUSHI LAXMAN SONAWANE AND OTHERS
                                         VERSUS
                   THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

                                                  …
             Mr. A.S. Shelke – Advocate for Petitioners
             Mr. D.R. Korde – AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4, State
             Mr. S.D. Madne h/f. Mr. A.G. Ambetkar – Advocate for Respondent Nos.6
             and 7
                                                  …

                                      CORAM         : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                      DATE          : 09.03.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.       In view of the order dated 06.08.2018 passed by this Court, both

             the petitions are disposed of.


             2.       Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.




                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE


             Pooja Kale/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.