Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHD. NANDEEM AHMED MOMINversusM.D. M.S.E.D.C.L. COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and prosecute the writ.

Summary

Mohd Nandeem Ahmed Momin filed Writ Petition No. 8145 of 2014 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against M.D. M.S.E.D.C.L. Company Ltd. and another. The petitioner was required to appear before the court on 30 July 2026 but was absent. The court recorded the petitioner's absence and noted that no further prosecution of the petition had been undertaken. Consequently, the court exercised its inherent power to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was ordered without any substantive consideration of the merits, as the procedural requirement of prosecution was not satisfied.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's absence?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural law
  • civil procedure
  • court absence

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34210



                                                                   908 WP8145.2014
                                               -1-

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             908 WRIT PETITION NO. 8145 OF 2014

                              MOHD. NANDEEM AHMED MOMIN
                                            VERSUS
                        M.D. M.S.E.D.C.L. COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER
                                              ...

                                           CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                              Date : 06.08.2026

              PER COURT :-

              1.           Recording absence of the Petitioner, ON 30.07.2026,

              the Petition was posted for dismissal today. Even today, none

              present.


              2.           As such, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of

              prosecution.




                                                     (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)

              marathe


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.